JoachimSchipper comments on Welcome to Less Wrong! - Less Wrong

48 Post author: MBlume 16 April 2009 09:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1953)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoachimSchipper 04 January 2012 10:14:26AM *  0 points [-]

I put some text from recent comments by both AspiringKnitter and Will_Newsome into I write like; it suggested that AspiringKnitter writes "like" Arthur Clarke (2001: A Space Odyssey and other books) while Will_Newsome writes "like" Vladimir Nabokov (Lolita and other books). I've never read either, but it does look like a convenient textual comparison doesn't trivially point to them being the same.

Also, if AspiringKnitter is a sockpuppet, it's at least an interesting one.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 04 January 2012 11:33:29AM *  2 points [-]

When I put your first paragraph in that confabulator, it says "Vladimir Nabokov". If I remove the words "Vladimir Nabokov (Lolita and other books)" from the paragraph, it says "H.P. Lovecraft". It doesn't seem to cut possible texts into clusters well enough.

Comment author: wedrifid 04 January 2012 11:52:42AM *  2 points [-]

I just got H.P. Lovecraft, Dan Brown, and Edgar Allan Poe for three different comments. I am somewhat curious as to whether this page clusters better than random assignment.

ETA: @#%#! I just got Dan Brown again, this time for the last post I wrote. This site is insulting me!

Comment author: [deleted] 04 January 2012 02:41:37PM 1 point [-]

I just got Dan Brown again, this time for the last post I wrote. This site is insulting me!

Apparently I write like Stephenie Meyer. And you feel insulted?

Comment author: JoachimSchipper 04 January 2012 11:48:11AM *  0 points [-]

Looks like you are right. Two of my (larger, to give the algorithm more to work with) texts from other sources gave Cory Doctorow (technical piece) and again Lovecraft (a Hacker News comment about drug dogs?)

Sorry, and thanks for the correction.