EHeller comments on Welcome to Less Wrong! (5th thread, March 2013) - Less Wrong

27 Post author: orthonormal 01 April 2013 04:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1750)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: EHeller 17 April 2013 06:26:47PM 1 point [-]

If you assume that the marks result from defects in the tool that accumulate, it should be relatively easy to build (and test) a monotonic model

The first assumption seems bad to me- I would assume defects accumulate only until equipment is reset or repaired, which is why I think you'd want some actual data.

Comment author: Vaniver 17 April 2013 07:09:14PM 1 point [-]

The first assumption seems bad to me- I would assume defects accumulate only until equipment is reset or repaired, which is why I think you'd want some actual data.

That looks to me like it agrees with my assumption; I suspect my grammar is somehow unclear. (Note the last line of the grandparent.)

Comment author: HumanitiesResearcher 18 April 2013 05:18:51AM 0 points [-]

Yes, I see an accord between your statement and Vaniver's. As I said below, most tools have very slow repair cycles.