Vaniver comments on LessWrong 2.0 - Less Wrong

89 Post author: Vaniver 09 December 2015 06:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (312)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 10 January 2016 06:12:42PM 1 point [-]

If a quant outsider constructs a very influential model, I could see that ending up in a Nobel, especially if it goes through a conventional publication process. I think though quants are generally kept very busy with non-academic things.

For finance in particular, my impression is that quants that make good discoveries keep them to themselves, because that's how they make money! After a while, some academic notices the same thing, formalizes it, and then publishes, and then the opportunity is gone.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 January 2016 03:37:30PM 1 point [-]

that quants that make good discoveries keep them to themselves, because that's how they make money!

There is a saying: In finance, if you get results you trade and if you don't, you publish :-/

There are exceptions, of course -- Asness comes to mind.