People with aphantasia typically think that when someone says to "picture X in your mind", they're being entirely metaphorical. If you don't have a mind's eye, that's a super reasonable thing to think, but it turns out that you'd be wrong!

In that spirit, I recently discovered that many expressions about "feelings in your body" are not metaphorical. Sometimes, people literally feel a lump in their throat when they feel sad, or literally feel like their head is hot ("hot-headed") when they're angry.

It seems pretty likely to me that there are other non-metaphors that I currently think are metaphors, and likewise for other people here. So: what are some things that you thought were metaphors, that you later discovered were not metaphors?

New Answer
New Comment

19 Answers sorted by

Garrett Baker

360

I believed “bear spray” was a metaphor for a gun. Eg if you were posting online about camping and concerned about the algorithm disliking your use of the word gun, were going into a state park which has guns banned, or didn’t want to mention “gun” for some other reason, then you’d say “bear spray”, since bear spray is such an absurd & silly concept that people will certainly understand what you really mean.

Turns out, bear spray is real. Its pepper spray on steroids, and is actually more effective than a gun, since its easier to aim and is optimized to blind & actually cause pain rather than just damage. [EDIT:] Though see Jimmy's comment below for a counter-point.

[-]jimmy256

So far as I can tell, the common line that bear spray is more effective than firearms is based on an atrociously bad reading of the (limited) science, which is disavowed by the author of the studies. In short, successfully spraying a bear is more effective at driving off curious bears than simply having a firearm is are at stopping charging bears, but when you're comparing apples to apples then firearms are much more effective.

Here's a pretty good overview: https://www.outsideonline.com/2401248/does-bear-spray-work.  I haven't put a ton of work into verifying what he's claiming here, but it does match with the other data I've seen and I haven't seen anyone be nearly as careful and reach the opposite conclusion.

1DCasey
I quite liked this video on the topic when I watched it awhile back:  Where he goes over the 2 reports and 2 studies on the topic and discusses "hey, wind tho."  What I most remember from is a high rated comment on the video, rather than in it proper.  An author who had been mauled, done interviews, and written a book on the topic claimed that bears committed to killing you don't tend to engage in threat displays - they stalk you, charge you from downwind and run you over, then circle back to start eating.  Many people reporting what did or didn't work to prevent being attacked by a bear were likely not actually at high risk of being attacked, they just shot or sprayed a bear who was attempting to be very clear about their boundaries.  Right or wrong, what the comment illustrates well is that the studies don't distinguish between aggression as threat display and aggression as actively dangerous behavior.

Remember: Bear spray does not work like bug spray!

2tinkady

the gears to ascension

327

these might all be relatively obvious but here are some I've found nice to notice

"I didn't hear that" when people's low level processing fails to parse words someone said despite being perfectly able to receive the audio. not usually playing fool, in my experience

That’s why I appreciate a “hey” or some other initial phrase before someone starts speaking to me. It gets me ready to parse words. For some people I talk to if I start speaking without that, I’ll mostly get a “what did you say?”.

The weight bit interests me. Is this where weights on a graph come from as well? Is that coincidence? I had assumed that they were called weights within the metaphor of a neural network as a graph. 

3the gears to ascension
hmm actually, I think I was the one who was wrong on that one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synaptic_weight seems to indicate the process I remembered existing doesn't primarily work how I thought it did.
[+][comment deleted]10

Matt Goldenberg

258

I used to think "getting lost in your eyes" was a metaphor, until I made eye contact with particularly beautiful woman in college and found myself losing track of where I was and what I was doing.

[-]gwern2718

I had a related one as a teenager: there are various expressions about women being too beautiful to look at or that it hurt to look at, etc. I thought they were all overwrought literary expressions - a woman you loved or had a crush on, sure, that's love, but just a random woman? - until I went to dinner in a group which happened to include such a woman.

(Thankfully, being a large group in a noisy restaurant, I could get away with not looking at her all evening; although I got a little angry this could even be a thing - I never signed up for that! I've wondered if or how long it'd take for that to wear off, but I never saw her again, so I have no idea.)

Nate Showell

222

"Seeing the light" to describe having a mystical experience. Seeing bright lights while meditating or praying is an experience that many practitioners have reported, even across religious traditions that didn't have much contact with each other.

Shankar Sivarajan

194

One's heart skipping a beat. I thought it was just a poetic way of saying something like "time stood still,"  but no, it turns out it does do that pretty literally.

pathos_bot

180

On the opposite end, when I was young I learned about the term "Stock market crash", referring to 1929, and I thought literally a car crashed into the physical location where stocks were traded, leading to mass confusion and kickstarting the Great Depression. Though if that actually happened back then, it would have led to a temporary crash in the market.

When I was a kid and 9/11 happened, some people online were talking about the effect on the stock market. My mom told me that the stock exchange was down the street from the WTC and not damaged, so I thought the people on the Internet were all wrong.

duck_master

150

When I visited Manhattan, I realized that "Wall Street" and "Broadway" are not just overused clichés, but the names of actual streets (you can walk on them!)

Cheese Mann

121

This feels closely related to Alexithymia or emotion blindness

Extremely common in: people with ADHD / Autism (potentially over half)

Fairly common in: people who have PTSD, people with substance abuse issues (possibly causal, alexithymia -> drugs to feel something), and men (male-normative alexithymia)

People with alexithymia often identify their emotions primarily through physical sensations

For me (a male with autism, ADHD and PTSD) I can tell I'm feeling scared or anxious if my legs get cold (I believe this is a common form)

Reminds me of how a few years ago I realized that I don't feel some forms of stress but can infer I'm stressed by noticing reduction in my nonverbal communication.

This FULLY explains my experience with panic attacks. I occasionally get all the physical symptoms, think something like "Huh, my heart is racing and it feels like air doesn't work. I wonder why?". I monitor my breathing and pulse for a while to make sure I haven't forgotten how to automatically-alive or something, and (since it's never been a heart attack before) go on with my day.

Would have been nice to know in elementary school when attempting to describe my experience with emotions (I thought I didn't have any) got me treated for depression for a year.

I have a beef with the theory of male-normative alexithymia; it does not distinguish well between hiding emotion, and outright not feeling an emotion.

Plenty of emotions are not innate but externally induced through social pressure and culture. It is perfectly plausible and normal for a man to not have particular feelings about X, until society repeatedly insists that X is Bad or Good, and the man should feel badness or goodness to conform. 

For example, the feelings of sexual jealousy, and of grieving after someone's death seem to be extremely culture specific, in a way that is easier to explain if these emotions were induced by ritualistic actions and only then internalized, and not the reverse.

Oh yeah. How do I know I'm angry? My back is stiff and starts to hurt.

Jacob Pfau

121

For most forms of exercise (cardio, weightlifting, HIIT etc.) there's a a spectrum of default experiences people can have from feeling a drug-like high to grindingly unpleasant. "Runner's high" is not a metaphor, and muscle pump while weightlifting can feel similarly good. I recommend experimenting to find what's pleasant for you, though I'd guess valence of exercise is, unfortunately, quite correlated across forms.

Another axis of variation is the felt experience of music. "Music is emotional" is something almost everyone can agree to, but, for some, emotional songs can be frequently tear-jerking and for others that never happens.

Weight lifters feeling "pumped" is similarly literal. I get this from rock climbing more often than lifting, but after a particularly strenuous climb, your arm muscles feel inflated--they're engorged with blood. It can take a minute for it to subside.

1Jacob Pfau
Wow I hadn't even considered people not taking this literally
1whestler
And here I was thinking it was a metaphor. Like, they feel literally inflated? If I've been climbing and I'm tired my muscles feel weak, but not inflated. I've never felt that way before.

"Music is emotional" is something almost everyone can agree to, but, for some, emotional songs can be frequently tear-jerking and for others that never happens

I'm now curious if anyone thinks "this gave me chills" is just a metaphor. Music has literally given me chills quite a few times.

3gwern
I bet there are plenty of amusics who understand that other people get a lot out of music emotionally but think that that would be hyperbole: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusia#Social_and_emotional
1transhumanist_atom_understander
I didn't feel chills from music for a long time, and then started to get them again after doing physical therapy and learning exercises to straighten my back and improve my posture. It was a notable enough change that I reported it to my physical therapists, but I don't recall how I interpreted it at the time ("I'm getting chills again" vs "chills are real??" or what).

Moreover, both the runner's high and the pump correlate very obviously with the progress of the training, both in session and in the long term. Most forms of training usually start as grindingly unpleasant, then morph into a physical pump that directly causes emotional pump, and finally go back to mild grind once the body is exhausted.

With a repeatable training regimen this is easy to notice. For example, my runs are almost always 5km distance, and the "emotional high" lasts pretty much exactly between 2km and 4km, in near perfect accordance with my bpm an... (read more)

I thought the exercise thing (like runner's high, feeling pumped, etc) were all metaphors, but I was surprised to learn other people actually felt good after exercise. Whatever it is, I'm missing the mechanics, and exercise is pure duty (so I try to get it doing other things I enjoy, such as walking my dog and chasing children around). 

I've had the opposite experience with music, when I said a harmony made me feel shivers and the other person didn't realise I was being literal. 

quetzal_rainbow

122

My example is when people say "I enjoy life" they mean actually enjoying life-as-whole and not like "I'm glad my life is net-positive" or whatever.

What's the distinction?

8quetzal_rainbow
For me, "enjoying life" means "enjoying good things that happen in life", while everything in-between is neutral at best. Many people seem to put positive value on "in-between" space. If I try to point out, some people enjoy just the fact of being embodied.
4dirk
I enjoy being embodied, and I'd describe what I enjoy as the sensation rather than the fact. Proprioception feels pleasant, touch (for most things one is typically likely to touch) feels pleasant, it is a joy to have limbs and to move them through space. So many joints to flex, so many muscles to tense and untense. (Of course, sometimes one feels pain, but this is thankfully the exception rather than the rule).

SarahNibs

113

Feeling pain after hearing a bad joke. "That's literally painful to hear" is self-reportedly (I say in the same way I, without a mind's eye, would say about mind's-eye-people) actually literal for some people.

Oh yeah, this. I used to think that "argh" or "it hurts" were just hyperbolic compliments for an excellent pun. Turns out, puns actually are painful to some people.

Where's the pain?

2Shelby Stryker
It is the "cringe" feeling I believe. Its embarrassment on behalf of the bad joke not landing. I could also be irritation that your brain didn't get the reward it was anticipating. 
8Eric Neyman
My understanding of Sarah's comment was that the feeling is literally pain. At least for me, the cringe feeling doesn't literally hurt.
5Joey KL
I'm not sure I can come up with a distinguishing principle here, but I feel like some but not all unpleasant emotions feel similar to physical pain, such that I would call them a kind of pain ("emotional pain"), and cringing at a bad joke can be painful in this way.

Huh! For me, physical and emotional pain are two super different clusters of qualia.

3JackRi
When i am in emotional pain there is almost always an accompanying physical sensation. Like a tightness in the stomach.
4abramdemski
I would strongly guess that many people could physically locate the cringe pain, particularly if asked when they're experiencing it.
4Hastings
Sternum and neck for me
1momom2
Top of the head like when I'm trying to frown too hard

keltan

90

If I’ll probably see them again, I don’t miss people. I thought people saying they miss you were just being overly polite.

Ben Pace

72

I also was kind of surprised when it turned out 'gut feeling' actually meant a feeling in your belly-area.

Added: I wonder if the notion of 'having a hunch' comes from something that causes you to hunch over?

I think the gut thing is usually metaphorical though

Let's test this! I made a Twitter poll.

Sration

61

At a party several years ago an attractive intoxicated person made a pass at me unexpectedly. As a long time married, this isn’t something that happens. At that moment it literally felt like my knees fell out from under me. It was so unlike any other sensation! Im convinced it must have been “weak in the knees”.

Chipmonk

60

I wrote about my own experience discovering “feelings in the body” here

AvitalM

50

When I first had depression, I remember thinking everything felt dull, like all the color was sucked out of the world, but I thought this was a metaphor even in my own mind.  But then I learned from this post that probably my color perception actually was messed up by depression https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/09/12/toward-a-predictive-theory-of-depression/ 

Camille Berger

42

A few people referred to anaxithemia or overcoming it, I think most people don't realize how precise most expressions around feelings are.

"My arms are falling" is an expression in french to explain that you're shocked. I experienced myself my arms becoming impossible to move, as if filled with concrete, after going through some relational shocks (the same is true of "being blinded by X", some extremely intense emotions have literally made me blind for a few secs)

While I'm at it, some mental shocks literally feel like a physical shock! One of those felt for me like an egg being broken against my skull.

"Making nodes in one's head" means overthinking something. "Untying things" means getting helpful insights. However, it's literally what I went through during therapy. There is a literal feeling of untying an invisible "force field", and those nodes are almost always correlated with mental schemes that are uselessly complex. Some people are genuinely worried that you could actively harm your own mental health through overthinking, they're not just finding an excuse for switching topics!

"Vibes" and "vibe" are extremely concrete things for people who got into very special states of consciousness. The french equivalent for that, "ondes", felt so radio-communication related I thought it had to be some telepathy pseudoscience BS. Actually, people are talking about components of subjective perceptions, and some of those (e.g. color, or mood) literally feel/behave like waves when under altered consciousness, and engage in resonance effects as well. To the detriment of the image, however, there seems to be a real contingent that extends this observation to "and we can use them to do telepathy or influence fate".

"Making nodes in one's head" → probably meant knots?

Ppau

4-4

Sorry, I'm being very pedantic, but how are "picturing" and "mind's eye" not metaphorical? It's not like there's an actual picture or an actual eye anywhere, in fact that's the whole point

There is (for me) an actual experience of a picture. It seems only slightly metaphorical to call the faculty of experiencing such pictures “seeing” by an “eye”.

One test for the possession of such a faculty might be to count the vertexes of some regular (not necessarily Platonic) polyhedron, given only a verbal description.

2Ppau
I didn't know about that test! Pretty neat, and it seems better than the "color of the apple" one To be clear I am not pushing back on the notion of aphantasia, although I'm not necessarily a fan And I don't think I have aphantasia My point was more about metaphors, and about the fact that much more of our communication relies on them than we realize
4Richard_Kennaway
That's not an official test, just something I thought up!
1robo
...I do not believe this test.  I'd be very good at counting vertices on a polyhedron through visualization and very bad at experiencing the sensation of seeing it.  I do "visualize" the polyhedra, but I don't "see" them.  (Frankly I suspect people who say they experience "seeing" images are just fooling themselves based on e.g. asking them to visualize a bicycle and having them draw it)
6Kaj_Sotala
I have a friend with eidetic imagination who says that for her, there is literally no difference between seeing something and imagining it. Sometimes she's worried about losing track of reality if she were to imagine too much.
6Matt Goldenberg
No, people really do see it, that whispiness can be crisp and clear I'm not the most visual person. But occasionally when I'm reading I'll start seeing the scene. I then get jolted out of it when I realize I don't know how I'm seeing the words as they've been replaced with the imagined visuals
5romeostevensit
+1 it took a while as a child before I came to understand that reading a book and watching a movie were meaningfully different for some people.
7Eric Neyman
It took until I was today years old to realize that reading a book and watching a movie are visually similar experiences for some people!
6Richard_Kennaway
What distinction are you making between "visualising" and "seeing"? I've heard of that study about drawing bicycles. I can draw one just fine without having one before me. I have just done so, checked it, and every detail (that I included — this was just a two-minute sketch) was correct. Anyway, if people are as astonishingly bad at the task as the paper says, that just reflects on their memory, not the acuity of their mind's eye. I expect there are people who can draw a map of Europe with all the country borders, whereas I probably wouldn't even remember all of the countries.
2Eric Neyman
Oh, that's a good point. Here's a freehand map of the US I drew last year (just the borders, not the outline). I feel like I must have been using my mind's eye to draw it.
1robo
Good question!  By "seeing" I meant having qualia, an apparent subjective experience.  By "visualizing" I meant...something like using the geometric intuitions you get by looking at stuff, but perhaps in a philosophical zombie sort of way?  You could use non-visual intuitions to count the vertices on a polyhedron, like algebraic intuitions or 3D tactile intuitions (and I bet blind mathematicians do).  I'm not using those.  I'm thinking about a wireframe image, drawn flat. I'm visualizing a rhombicosidodecahedron right now.  If I ask myself "The pentagon on the right and the one hiding from view on the left -- are they the same orientation?", I'll think "ahh, let's see...  The pentagon on the right connects through the squares to those three pentagons there, which interlock with those 2/4 pentagons there, which connect through squares to the one on the left, which, no, that left one is upside-down compared to the one on the right -- the middle interlocking pentagons rotated the left assembly 36° compared to the right".  Or ask "that square between the right pentagon and the pentagon at 10:20 above it <mental point>.  Does perspective mean the square's drawn as a diamond, or a skewed rectangle, weird quadrilateral?" and I think "Nah, not diamond shaped -- it's a pretty rectangular trapezoid.  The base is maybe 1.8x height?  Though I'm not too good at guessing aspect ratios?  Seems like I if I rotate the trapezoid I can fit 2 into the base but go over by a bit?" I'm putting into words a thought process which is very visual, BUT there is almost no inner cinema going along with those visualizations.  At most ghostly, wispy images, if that.  A bit like the fleeting oscillating visual feeling you get when your left and right eyes are shown different colors?
7Richard_Kennaway
I have qualia for imagined scenes. I'm not seeing them with my physical eyes, and they're not superimposed on the visual field that comes from my physical eyes. It's like they exist in a separate three-dimensional space that does not have any particular spatial relationship to the physical space around me.
5Eric Neyman
I think very few people have a very high-fidelity mind's eye. I think the reason that I can't draw a bicycle is that my mind's eye isn't powerful/detailed enough to be able to correctly picture a bicycle. But there's definitely a sense in which I can "picture" a bicycle, and the picture is engaging something sort of like my ability to see things, rather than just being an abstract representation of a bicycle. (But like, it's not quite literally a picture, in that I'm not, like, hallucinating a bicycle. Like it's not literally in my field of vision.)
4Michael Roe
To add to the differences between people: I can choose to see mental images actually overlaid over my field of vision, or somehow in a separate space. The obvious question someone might ask: can you trace an overlaid mental image? The problem is registration - if my eyes move, the overlaid mental image can shift relative to an actual, perceived, sheet of paper. Easier to do a side by side copy than trace.

If you want to be truly pendatic, the "mind's eye" and "picturing" are analogies and not metaphors. 

The mind's eye is like that of a physical, sensory eye, but doesn't replace it.

Analogy: "Joe looks at you, his eyes like gemstones"
Metaphor: "Joe looks at your with his gemstones"

Analogy: "I am picturing it in my mind's eye as if I had a second pair of eyes"
Metaphor: "I am picturing it with my second pair of eyes"
 

If you want to be even more pendantic, we could have a Idealist discussion of the metaphysics of sense and that all pictures are mental ... (read more)

1Ppau
Your first point is a good one And your second point successfully annoyed me

Do you ever have visual experiences in dreams? It's like that, but you're awake. 

Gesild Muka

20

"Home is where the heart is."

I thought this meant something like home is where longing is (your metaphorical heart), the place that you yearn for the most. Now I think it may simply mean that home is wherever your physical beating heart is. The message behind it being that you can adapt to feel at home most anywhere.

"Breathtaking."

I thought this was just an expression to explain natural beauty but I actually felt the breath leave me when I was young from suddenly seeing a sweeping vista of mountains and forest while riding on a bus when I was a teen.

6 comments, sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Related; when you never realized a compound word had a literal meaning....

Cup board -- board to put cups on -- cupboard

Medi terrain -- between two continents -- Mediterranean

Etc.

Scripts and screenplays are very interesting examples of this.
Manuscript is a handwritten script (manual script), which seems a bit redundant before modern presses. A screenplay is a play written for the (silver) screen. i.e. a mirror upon which a film projector bounced off images from.

It only just occurred to me that a playwright is not someone who writes plays but akin to a Cartwright.

Mesopotamia -- literally "between the rivers. "

Hippopotamus -- water horse

Welcome -- "well-come" - coming in a state of wellness (I don't know if this approximates the modern health connotations, or is more general 'goodness' which may have in older forms of English indistinguishable). It reminds me of the Modern Greek expression γειά σου/σας literally "good health to you".

Speaking of metaphors and Greek, there's a lovely anecdote about the whimsy of seeing in Greece moving vans emblazoned with the word 'metaphora' on them. It being a compound word which originally meant to carry from one place to another. Which metaphorically is what a linguistic metaphor does: carry meaning from one topos to another.



 

I only realised the latter when I saw the Dutch word for this “middellandse zee”. The sea in the middle of the lands.

“Terranean” had never scanned separately to me

As someone with aphantasia, I can confirm: It has only just occurred to me that someone asking me to picture something in my mind might be asking that in a literal sense.

I like this question a lot, but I'm more interested in its opposite, so I asked it!

Annoyingly I have the recollection of having thought "oh, that's not a metaphor?" several times in my life, but I don't seem to have saved what the things in question actually were.