b1shop comments on 2013 Less Wrong Census/Survey - Less Wrong

78 Post author: Yvain 22 November 2013 09:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: b1shop 25 November 2013 06:39:25AM 4 points [-]

A comment on the prize for those who've already taken it:

Qrsrpg frrzf yvxr pyrneyl gur evtug zbir. Gurer'yy or uhaqerqf bs erfcbaqragf fb V'yy unir n znetvany vzcnpg ba gur fvmr bs gur cevmr. Ubjrire, V dhnqehcyr zl punapr bs jvaavat ol pubbfvat qrsrpg. Gung orvat fnvq, V ubcr lbh cvpxrq pbbcrengr.

Comment author: notsonewuser 01 January 2014 05:07:48PM 0 points [-]

Good thing other people didn't reason that way! I would be much more likely to defect if I was competing with people who had not read Less Wrong.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 25 November 2013 08:24:58AM -1 points [-]

Gung vf cerpvfryl gur ernfba jul guvf xvaq xvaq bs ernfbavat qbrfa'g jbex. Unira'g lbh ernq hc ba gur cevfbaref qvyrzn? Be qb lbh vzcyl gung YJref jvyy zber yvxryl pbbcrengr guna abg. Gung znl or pbeerpg - ohg bayl vs lbh pubbfr cebonovyvfgvpnyyl. Gur engvbany nccebnpu urer vf gb ebyy n qvr naq qrsrpg jvgu $c= 25%-rcfvyba$ (rcfvyba orvat n ohssre sbe gubfr abg fzneg rabhtu). Gung jvyy znkvzvmr birenyy cre crefba.

Comment author: b1shop 08 December 2013 05:41:36PM 0 points [-]

Thanks for picking cooperate.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 08 December 2013 08:50:09PM 1 point [-]

Huh? Nothing to thank. I did roll the die and would have defected on a 1. That would have been the most sensible move for all involved.

Or did you thank me for applying the procedure? In that case: Appreciated.