Desrtopa comments on Amanda Knox: post mortem - Less Wrong

23 Post author: gwern 20 October 2011 04:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (483)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 21 October 2011 06:27:07AM 1 point [-]

This occurred to me, but I suspect that it would still be easier to catch more people this way than with active policing, particularly for the crimes you most care about catching people at, which most people will already know are wrong and probably if not definitely illegal.

And you could always ask them, "Are you cultivating deliberate unawareness?"

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 31 October 2011 09:37:36AM 0 points [-]

The whole point of deliberate unawareness is that it's unaware-- the deliberate part gets hidden in mental fog.

Comment author: dbaupp 21 October 2011 07:25:06AM 0 points [-]

I agree with that this method seems far easier to catch the majority of people committing those crimes, since the cultivation process would most likely be non-trivial, so the "casual" criminal wouldn't have access to it.

There is still the problem of someone else doing the cultivation, so one mastermind could create a militia of people immune to the checkups. (I'm not quite sure if this is actually possible though, although, superficially at least, hypnosis seems to do this sort of thing)

(Thanks for the "cultivating deliberate unawareness" term)