Desrtopa comments on Amanda Knox: post mortem - Less Wrong

23 Post author: gwern 20 October 2011 04:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (483)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 29 October 2011 05:11:11AM *  2 points [-]

The family of the British girl killed in Italy expressed dismay that the original evidence was unreliable and has accepted that Amanda Knox may be innocent after all.

Is this really true? It isn't reflected in the quotes that I've read so far.

I went and did a bit more reading on the Troy Davis case, and I don't think they're that comparable. In the evidentiary hearing, the court found that several of the alleged recantations by witnesses were not recantations at all; most of the witnesses were still claiming Davis's guilt. The murder weapon was never recovered, so they have no prints.

Considering the unreliability of eyewitnesses, especially when the police are encouraging a particular response, it's a lot less confidence than I'd want before applying the death penalty, setting aside the issue of whether it's ever an appropriate punishment, but I don't think it can reasonably be compared to the Knox and Sollecito trial, where the defendants were almost certainly innocent.

Comment author: komponisto 29 October 2011 06:15:01AM 1 point [-]

The family of the British girl killed in Italy expressed dismay that the original evidence was unreliable and has accepted that Amanda Knox may be innocent after all.

Is this really true? It isn't reflected in the quotes that I've read so far.

Indeed it isn't -- what they have said is that they plan to support the prosecution's appeal of the acquittal. (In fact, as the Italian system allows, they are actually a party to the case, seeking a monetary judgement against Knox and Sollecito. [This fact should not be confused with the recent false reports that they were planning to sue Knox in another jurisdiction.])